Several factors can
affect the reliability of a test (Mehrens & Lehmann, 1991; Sattler, 2001):
 
  
 
v  Generally,
  the longer a test is, the more reliable it is. 
 
v  When
  a test is a speed test, reliability can be problematic. It is inappropriate
  to estimate reliability using internal consistency, test-retest, or alternate
  form methods. This is because not every student is able to complete all of
  the items in a speed test. In contrast, a power test is a test in which every
  student is able to complete all the items. 
 
v  In
  general, the more heterogeneous the group of students who take the test, the
  more reliable the measure will be. 
 
v  When
  there is little variability among test scores, the reliability will be low.
  Thus, reliability will be low if a test is so easy that every student gets
  most or all of the items correct or so difficult that every student gets most
  or all of the items wrong. 
 
v  Objectively
  scored tests, rather than subjectively scored tests, show a higher
  reliability. 
 
v  The
  shorter the time interval between two administrations of a test, the less
  likely that changes will occur and the higher the reliability will be. 
 
v  Errors
  in the testing situation (e.g., students misunderstanding or misreading test
  directions, noise level, distractions, and sickness) can cause test scores to
  vary. 
 | 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment