Several factors can
affect the reliability of a test (Mehrens & Lehmann, 1991; Sattler, 2001):
v Generally,
the longer a test is, the more reliable it is.
v When
a test is a speed test, reliability can be problematic. It is inappropriate
to estimate reliability using internal consistency, test-retest, or alternate
form methods. This is because not every student is able to complete all of
the items in a speed test. In contrast, a power test is a test in which every
student is able to complete all the items.
v In
general, the more heterogeneous the group of students who take the test, the
more reliable the measure will be.
v When
there is little variability among test scores, the reliability will be low.
Thus, reliability will be low if a test is so easy that every student gets
most or all of the items correct or so difficult that every student gets most
or all of the items wrong.
v Objectively
scored tests, rather than subjectively scored tests, show a higher
reliability.
v The
shorter the time interval between two administrations of a test, the less
likely that changes will occur and the higher the reliability will be.
v Errors
in the testing situation (e.g., students misunderstanding or misreading test
directions, noise level, distractions, and sickness) can cause test scores to
vary.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment